Weekend: I don’t need to know your last name to know you

Every film has it’s issues, of course, and Weekend‘s definitely include the immense amount of substance use and the mildly non-consensual sex, but I did really enjoy this movie.

Weekend tells the story of Russell, who meets a man at a bar. He and Glenn, the man he quickly falls in love with, spend the next 48 hours together, before Glenn leaves to move to America. While the 48 hours were short, and both knew they would not last, they grow closer as the film progresses, and they both end up growing a lot throughout the movie.

The day that Glenn has to leave for his train, Russell does not plan on trying to stop him. He knows that art school is what Glenn wants, and ultimately Russell wants what is best for him; however, as Russell is at his god-daughter’s birthday party, his best friend convinces him to at least go say goodbye.

At the train station, the two men get a proper goodbye, and even though there were no confessions of love, it is clear that the two greatly care for the other– regardless of if they will ever get to see each other again.

Representation Correction

This film was one of the first big queer movies to come out after Brokeback Mountain, and it acted as a sort of correction in the eyes of queer representation.

The move does a wonderful job showing the softness that men can have with another, rather than the hyper masculinity that is seen in Brokeback Mountain. While the two still don’t get their “happily ever after,” the movie still acts as a sort of reset on what viewers expect to see in queer media.

Queer Connections

What I think this film does a really beautiful job of is showing queer connections.

Glenn and Russell grow beyond close to one another, even though it is just throughout a weekend. I think that a lot of audience’s might not think that is a natural response to spending one weekend together, a total of 48 hours, but I think that as a queer viewer, I can understand the film more.

They have something so crucial to their identities in common: their queerness. This innate difference from the “norm” truly allows them to grow close to one another, supporting one’s differences and understanding each other in a way that their straight friends simply cannot.

Because of this, they are able to support one another. Throughout the film, it is clear that Russell has difficulties expressing his queerness in public, and that he isn’t comfortable showing it. Glenn, who is an artist, is very comfortable with his sexuality, and is working on an art project, recording post sex monologues from his partners. His comfortability of his sexuality is what started their relationship, and it goes to show their differences.

One of the most important scenes, in my opinion, is when the two of them are laying in bed, softly talking to one another. Russell tells Glenn that he is most comfortable when he is alone, and that he doesn’t even second guess himself.

Knowing that Russell, an orphan, never got to come out to his parents, the two men run through a simple role-play coming out scene, where Glenn acts as Russell’s father. I originally cringed at the idea, fearing that because they were sexual partners that it would be weird, but the scene was incredibly heartwarming. Russell is finally able to, out loud, express his identity, and it is clear that the conversation really helped him.

When Russell and Glenn are saying goodbye at the train station, Russell openly kisses Glenn, something he would have never even thought of doing in public, and that scene is a direct cause and effect of their role-play, as he is finally comfortable as himself.

Seeing this is just a reminder of how little someone has to be in your life to have a positive effect on you. They knew eachother for a weekend, not even knowing each other’s last name, and yet, they made such an impact on one another.

Works Cited

Haigh, Andrew, director. Weekend, 2011, https://www.amazon.com/Weekend-Tom-Cullen/dp/B0090EHLUY. Accessed 2024.


Discover more from Eleanor Nelson Art

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Comments

4 responses to “Weekend: I don’t need to know your last name to know you”

  1. Nicole Stander Avatar
    Nicole Stander

    I appreciate your mentioning the non-consensual sex. It’s so important to have that conversation about alcohol and sex and consent. It’s difficult because it seems that Russel went to the club with the intention of hooking up with a stranger, and drank alcohol with the intention of having drunk sex with whatever stranger picked him up. However, that becomes such a dangerous sphere to operate in, because Russel could have been taken home by someone he didn’t actually want to sleep with or engaged in more aggressive sex acts than he intended. I’m not victim blaming Russel, I’m not even sure if he would even consider himself a victim, but this kind of sexual engagement comes with high risks when you lose your senses. I’m familiar with the “consensual non consent” practiced by experienced members of the BDSM community, but this kind of behavior involves a great deal of trust between sexual partners, extensive discussions about what’s okay and what’s not, and a consideration of safety before, during, and after. It’s not something that I would advise attempting with strangers.

  2. Milo Nordman Avatar
    Milo Nordman

    I agree that the movie does a good job of showing how men can be vulnerable and soft, both with partners and with friends. A huge part of Russ’s journey is allowing himself to be vulnerable with his long-time friend, James. Glen helps Russ with this journey, which is just one way the two had an impact on each other. Great post!

  3. Antonia Nelson Avatar
    Antonia Nelson

    I do agree that the movie does a good job of showing men being vulnerable and soft, especially in comparison to Brokeback Mountain, but I also think that, in a way, that’s sort of expected of gay men in particular. You pointed out a lot of things about the movie that were nice, but I think ultimately you came to the same conclusion I did, which is that they aren’t in love, but they had a sort of bond and fondness for each other, which I didn’t mention in my own blog but you sort of did, is something that queer people experience often with other queer people. I enjoyed reading your blog! Thanks for sharing your perspective.

  4. I appreciate how you mention that, despite not being traditionally close, they both seem to have a positive benefit on the other’s life, even though they know they likely won’t see each other ever again. I think it is hard to pin down if this movie is a sort of response to Brokeback or if it just follows a parallel sort of structure. There are a lot of similarities, and this one is ultimately more of a positive representation, but I feel like it isn’t one correcting the other, but rather them telling 2 different stories of how to be a gay man in different times and settings.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *